TeacherHero plans a science unit backwards from what students must produce. You state the phenomenon and the learning target; each day is generated as six gradual-release sections that build toward it, with your own lab handouts and readings in context, and an end-of-unit assessment anchored to the lessons you actually taught.
Science planning breaks in a specific place: the phenomenon is strong, the lab is strong, and the assessment quietly tests something else. That gap is invisible while you are writing day 4 in a different document from day 9, and it only shows up on the unit test.
The gradual-release spine every TeacherHero lesson is built on, and what each phase looks like in your room.
A short retrieval or prediction tied to the phenomenon, using what the class observed most recently rather than a generic bell-ringer.
You work the model, the calculation, or the interpretation out loud, walking the exact handout students have in front of them.
The class reasons through a second case with you — the step where a misconception is cheapest to catch.
Lab groups, station rotations, or a data-analysis task with a defined group product and your circulation questions written out.
Independent application: explain the phenomenon, argue from the evidence, or run the calculation without the scaffold.
One item that distinguishes “followed the procedure” from “can explain why,” with expected responses attached.
An end-of-unit assessment is generated from every lesson's target and final product, the unit's vocabulary, and the unit's materials. You approve a coverage blueprint before any items are written, and if you edit a lesson afterward, the assessment is marked stale until you re-approve.
Upload the lab sheet, safety protocol, or data table and confirm the excerpt. A section can be generated to adapt that specific material rather than invent a parallel version of it.
A generated section comes with the student-facing artifact it needs — a sorting set, a station card, a task sheet — validated for the right kind and enough items, not a strategy name with nothing behind it.
Yes. A connected assessment is generated from the unit's lessons — their targets, final products, vocabulary, and materials. You approve a coverage blueprint first, so you see what will be assessed before any items exist, and both a student paper and a separate answer key are produced.
You define the phenomenon and the target; the six sections are the release structure, not a content template. Because each section is generated with the unit's arc in context, the practice students do on day 6 builds on the sense-making they did on day 2 rather than resetting.
Upload your own safety document as a source and confirm the excerpt. Generation can be pointed at that material directly, so the wording you are required to use is adapted rather than paraphrased into something your department has not approved.
Anything drawn from your uploaded material is generated against the excerpt you confirmed. Content generated without a source is model-written and should be read as a draft you check — the same as any AI output. Nothing is auto-published, and you edit every section directly.
Creating an account lands you in a fully built example course, unit, week, and lesson, so you can watch the coach work on a real day before planning your own.
Start planning freeYour curriculum stays yours · Nothing is published unless you publish it
